One aspect of my disciplinary case with the Massachusetts Bar and its false findings calling me immoral is a microcosm of why professional rules of ethics should not be used as a normative process to regulate any profession, in particular that of being a lawyer. This aspect is the simple and undisputed fact that one […]
Tag Archives: Supreme Judicial Court Case 12025
They do not. I have studied philosophy my whole life, graduated from Harvard Law School, did trial work for 25 years, and wrote the book “An Existential Philosophy of Law”. They are complete opposites. Philosophy rationally seeks knowledge of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Law is the rationale by which the few […]
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI VALERIANO DIVIACCHI Private citizen Valeriano Diviacchi pursuant to the First Amendment states the following regarding SJC Case 12025, In Re Valeriano Diviacchi, in which the undersigned Valeriano Diviacchi was the only attorney involved who had the courage to speak honestly and truthfully to the best of his knowledge and ability; who was the […]
VALERIANO DIVIACCHI / The Truth on SJC Cases 12025 and 13241 The Truth on SJC Cases 12025 and 13241 / In re Valeriano Diviacchi